Gabrielle Giffords Returns – And Civility Is DOA

In January, Gabrielle Giffords suffered a gunshot wound to the head while holding an outdoor town hall meeting for her constituents. Very quickly, the discussion turned to the rhetoric and the environment that may be partially to blame for these kinds of attacks.

Last week a killer on a rampage in Norway made the claim that he was influenced by right wing ideologies, and carried out an attack that left dozens dead.

This week, Gabrielle Giffords made a remarkable return to the House floor to cast her vote on the debt ceiling deal. And there were smiles and tears from her colleagues upon her return. And that’s about how long it lasted.

For example, quotes like the following:

The DEMS stooped to a new LOW bringing in Giffords simply to Vote WHATEVER HER PARTY WANTED; NOT THE PEOPLE! That was a SHAMEFUL display! – @pompanopete

The consensus from these folks is that it was a publicity stunt. That her appearance was designed to nullify the fact that many Dems chose to vote no. Yes, it’s that cynical.

Others say she did a disservice by showing up. Like this:

Yup. That would be a complaint from the left.

Instead of things improving, they’re getting worse. Because at least, until recently, the rhetoric was being kept to the right side of the aisle. But now the left is doing the same thing.

Last week, when Governor Christie of NJ had an asthma attack, I saw posting after posting on Facebook and Twitter, as well as blogs, essentially saying he had it coming to him, that he deserved to die. I was appalled. I don’t care for Christie’s policies, his coziness with corporations and his self-interest in getting as much as he can. But he is a father. He has kids and a wife. Wishing him dead of a heart attack? How is that any different that saying Gabby Giffords injuries were her own fault?

And don’t give me the excuse that they were “just jokes”. That’s a load of crap. Jokes like that aren’t funny. But as soon as one of those jokes gets made against the guy you like, the outrage goes to 11. There’s plenty of hypocrisy to go around.

This week, in reference to the President, Rep. Douglas Lamborn said the following:

“I don’t even want to have to be associated with him. It’s like touching a tar baby, and you get it — you know, you’re stuck, and you’re part of the problem now, and you can’t get away,” Lamborn said. “I don’t want that to happen to us (Republicans), but if it does, or not, he’ll still get — properly so — the blame, because his policies, for four years, will have failed the American people.”

Now, to be fair, the idea of a “tar baby” can refer to a sticky situation. But it’s also a derogatory term for African-Americans. And anyone born in the last 50 years with some semblance of knowledge would know that. And I’m quite certain Lamborn did. He apologized, sort of:

Congressman Doug Lamborn (CO-05) today sent a personal letter to President Barack Obama apologizing for using a term  some find insensitive.

Note the phrasing here. It’s a typical non-apology apology. He says “using a term some find insensitive”. He doesn’t say he finds it insensitive. He says others find it insensitive. It’s not his fault, it’s your for knowing that “tar baby” is derogatory toward African-Americans, among others. Your fault, not his. Which somehow makes it ok. Every time one of these statements is allowed to pass, it makes the next one easier to swallow.

And back on the left side if the aisle is good ol’ Joe Biden. He decided to call Tea Party members who wanted to kill the debt ceiling deals “terrorists”. Joe’s always good for a quote, they say. But the Tea Party folk aren’t “terrorists”. They may be misguided, wrong-headed, and not have a clue how to govern. That does not make them terrorists. Because they aren’t interested in terror. They aren’t out to scare anyone, there were no “hostages” taken. This was not a “war”.

We have allowed the conversation to sink to the lowest common denominator. It’s about “battles”, “fights”, “wars”, “hostages”, putting individuals and districts “in the crosshairs” – the list goes on and on. And then we wonder why nothing gets done. We have made every nuance, every move, every discussion as vile and vicious as we can make it and get away with it. But the really scary part is that it used to be confined to one side of the aisle. Now, it comes from everywhere.

Gabby Giffords’ return to the House floor was triumphant and wonderful. But it’s also a reminder of the rhetoric that is getting worse by the day, rhetoric that quite likely had a hand in making that return more than just another day at the office.

OK – What’s With All The UPDATES?!?!!

You may have noticed that we’ve gotten a bit more active of late. That’s our goal, to find a variety of news stories from all over the Interwebz and bring them to you with our own take on the issues.

Now, in some cases, you may see a delay of a day or two. That’s for two reasons. First, we still have full-time jobs. If you are looking to help Leo retire, please feel free to shoot him an email! Because those nasty bill collectors want their dough, our intrepid group (both of us) still have to work support our blogging habit. Since employers frown on people blogging from their workstations, we simply collect links we see throughout the day, and do our writing in the evenings. We then do a little research, write the posts, and schedule them throughout the next day (or even farther out if there’s been a lot of news). So you see them appear both on our website and on our Facebook page about every two hours.

Why do we space them out? Because if we didn’t the Twitter and Facebook updates would all slam together and look like a mess, as well as annoy the crud out of people who follow us.

So, if you see a story you think is worth looking at, whether on the blog or on the show, send it to us! Post it to our Facebook page! Heck, make your own video and post it on YouTube or Facebook for us to see! Just tell us what news you’re keeping an eye on.

And remember you can follow us on twitter as well, @edited4clarity

Sunday Morning Cool – Pt. 2

From His Holiness The Dalai Lama:

Cultivating positive qualities of warmheartedness and a genuine sense of concern for other’s well-being has nothing to do with being a believer or a non-believer, His Holiness said. These are inner secular qualities necessary for a happy life, not some abstruse concepts of next life or heaven and hell, he added.

Simple truths. May we see more of them.

p.s. – yes, he does have a Facebook page.

You Always Knew It…

From Ad Age - Over 25% of Americans Use Facebook in the Can:

What’s more, AIS found that potty-poking was higher among women. Some 54% of female respondents admitted to doing it compared to 46% of male respondents. Of course, it doesn’t take a biologist or anthropologist or psychologist to point out that it’s much harder — and weirder — to “Like” something while standing at a urinal. (Though that’s not to say it isn’t done.)

Potty-poking? Ewww…

But honestly – are you really surprised?

Edited For Clarity – The Lost Show – Sexting & Parents

Transcript below the video:

Transcript

Thanks for hanging around…

Last week, teachers in some Clark County, NV schools had to have a talk with their fifth grade classes. It wasn’t about academics, no reading, writing or ‘rithmetic. No, the talk was about…

Sexting.

Yes, fifth graders, 10- and 11-year-olds had to be admonished on the topic of sexting and its dangers. Why? Because some had been caught sexting each other.

Again, these are 10- and 11-year-olds. Look I’m not naïve. I know kids learn about sex at a younger age. I know they are surrounded by the marketing of sex, bombarded with sexual images on a daily basis. But there’s a whole other problem here, isn’t there?

First, why do these kids have cell phones to text with? They’re 5th graders. What could they possibly need to have a cellphone for? If you need to get hold of them, you call the school. If they need to get hold of you, the school can call.

So the only reason I can see is that for some reason, the parents feel they need to have a cellphone before and after school. In other words, these kids aren’t necessarily going home.

Now I understand that child care is expensive. During the school year, I spend around 10% of my take home pay on childcare alone during the school year, so I understand the cost. And I understand that many, many families need two incomes to make it. So I understand parents not being able to pick kids up after school or be home when they are. But I was one of those kids. I came home every day, and I had to be there to answer the phone when my mom called. Took about 45 minutes to walk home, so I had to hustle.

It’s not like I didn’t get to play with friends, go to the pool, ride my bike around the neighborhood. No, I got to do all those things. But I came home first.

So like I said, I’m understanding of the situation. But I think a lot of folks are allowing things like cellphones take the place of responsibility for their kids. And I hear teachers complain about it as well.

Since the ill-conceived No Child Left Behind Act, teachers have been spending way too much time teaching to tests, meaning the more advanced kids get to twiddle their thumbs while the others work on scoring well on the test. Last week, the school district in Washington, D.C. Let go about 200 teachers for under-performing. The problem? 50% of their evaluation came from a single test score. I’m all for holding teachers accountable. It’s necessary. But I don’t think a single standardized test is going to do it.

But what does it have to do with parents? Well, a big problem with why schools are failing has to do with parents. Parents hold sway over school administrators, complaining whenever their kids get an unsatisfactory grade.

When I was a kid, if you got a bad grade, you didn’t want to go home. But more and more, I’m hearing of situations where the kid gets a bad grade, and the parent comes in to blame it on the teacher. They move the kid to a different class, ask for extensions on home work beyond the deadlines, ask for accommodations of every sort. And they get them, leaving teachers wondering what excatly they’re supposed to do. They are supposed to get these kids taught and have them pass standardized tests, but the kids get excused by their parents for their failure to work.

Remember when you actually worried about not passing to the next grade? Not anymore. No, apparently kids are no longer held back. It might hurt their self-esteem.

Did you catch that? It might hurt their self-esteem. Because it doesn’t hurt your self esteem more when the other kids are brighter than you are or can spell and read and you can’t. But they don’t get held back anymore. I’ll give you a guess where the whole self-esteem thing comes from.

Parents.

These are the same parents that have removed scoring from little league games, or soccer games. “They’re ALL winners”. No. No they’re not. Some kids are not going to be the next Landon Donovan. They don’t have the coordination. And that’s ok. But there are winners and losers in life. They’ll be good at something else, I promise. It’s not fair to them to give them a false sense of their abilities. It’s also not fair to the kids who are good to not be able to celebrate it. And how do you teach sportsmanship and being a good winner – if you don’t even have the chance to win. Or to be a good loser. Most importantly, the kids KNOW who won or lost. Do we really think we’re fooling them?

But of course, this came from parents. I’m sure it was well-meaning. No one wants their kid to feel bad. But it’s the wrong extreme. And so it is with not keeping kids back when it is warranted. If they’re held back, it’s for one of two reasons – they either are having learning problems, and need some additional help and time to catch up, or they have behavioral problems that are causing them to miss work or not pay attention.

Are there mitigating circumstances? Sure. Kids diagnosed with some type of problem such as dyslexia or ADHD can get accommodations and put into plans that will help them get to where they need to be scholastically. So it’s not like there isn’t a way to help those who really need it. But the kid who goofs off in class, refuses to do homework, and lies to their parent about it? That’s not something that needs accommodation. It’s something the parent needs to deal with. Instead, many of these parents are putting the blame on the teacher and are shocked to find out their student has been lying to them. And even when they do find out, they try to mitigate the consequences for the kid.

What exactly is this teaching the kid? If you complain enough, you can slack off and not have to do what’s expected? That the rules don’t apply? Just wait, these parents will be shocked -SHOCKED – when these kids have issues with authority in high school. They already know how the game is played, and they’ll work it.

So the issue comes down to parents. Look, I’m not a perfect dad. I try. Maybe it was my upbringing. Maybe I’m old fashioned about some things. But these kids are getting away with stuff we never would have dreamed of. And the parents are acting as enablers. Maybe it takes too much of their time. Maybe they’re overwhelmed. But either way, they’re doing their kids a disservice by letting them off the hook. And the teachers get to deal with it.

The sexting comes from a gap in supervision. Kids see this stuff, but we as parents can have a strong influence on where they take it. Kids might learn about it, but with good supervision – asking questions and being involved with their kids, we reduce the chance that they make bad choices.

What do you think? Should kids have cell phones? What age? Do you think parents are the problem? Leave us a note in the comments – we’d like to hear what you think.

We’ll be right back.

Edited For Clarity – V1 E7 – 7/19/10

Movin’ on up…! This week we were able to put together a teleprompter, so we changed the set around a bit and actually WROTE the show prior to shooting. Took a little getting used to, but the results will get better.

So, without further ado, here’s this week’s show. You’ll notice additional links starting this week – one byproduct of using the teleprompter is that there is automatically a transcript! So, for those that don’t have lickety-split Internet speeds, you can read the show!

News Update:

News Update Transcript: Click Here

Segment 2 – The Republican Strategy:  Video /   Transcript

Segment 3 – “Global Warming” Is Wrong:   Video /   Transcript

Segment 4 – International Grownup Field Trip Day:   Video /   Transcript

Segment 5 – CRANKED UP! – Unions:   Video /   Transcript

Segment 6 – Rock Sugar!:   Video /   Transcript

Segment 7 – Wrap Up and Contest:   Video /   Transcript

Transcript: Wrap Up and Contest – 7/19/10

Well thanks for watching this week’s show, we hope you enjoyed it.

If you saw something you liked, didn’t like, made you smile, made you mad- let us know. We’re always want to hear what you think. We take suggestions for show topics, critiques of the show, and the occasional compliment. So give us your feedback!

As always, we’d like to thank Dave Gosse for his donation of audio equipment. Dave’s business is Gadgets Inc. in Mississippi, online at gadgetincms.com. Dave offers video editing services, website design and hosting and a whole lot more. If you need some help getting your business to grow, check out Dave’s site.

We also have to be sure to give our music folks a plug- Kevin McLeod, whose music you can find at www.incompetech.com, and Dan-O, whose music is at danosongs.com.- Thanks guys for great bumper music.

As a reminder, our Facebook contest is still on – have a friend become a fan of the show and you could both win valuable Edited For Clarity schwag. Just make sure they tell us who sent them to our show. If they’re the right fan – you’ll both win some Edited For Clarity gear.

Well, that’s our time for this week, we’ll be back next week for a whole new show. We’ll give you another sample of Rock Sugar to take us out. Hope you gave a great week, and we’ll see you next time.

Edited For Clarity – V1 E6 – 7/9/10

We’re covering a lot of topics this week – Taxes, Afghanistan, the moratorium on oil drilling, LeBron James – we’re running the gamut.

As always, be sure to let us know what you think!

Segment 1 – News Update

Segment 2 – Afghanistan: Why?

Segment 3 – Fixing Taxes

Segment 4 – Why We Need A Moratorium

Segment 5 – CRANKED UP! – This week – Athletes and actors get paid more than our armed forces. WTF

Segment 6 – The Food Problem

Segment 7 – Facebook contest

Edited For Clarity – V1 E5

Sorry for the delay folks! This one took a while to get online. But no fear! We’ve already shot the next show and it should be up later today. So you get a two-fer!

A quick request – we’re looking for someone willing to sit through these and start transcribing. It pays exactly what we make – which means nothing… but if you like the show and love to type…

We’ve already posted excerpts of the show on Facebook, but below is the first segment and links to the rest…

INTRO AND NEWS UPDATES:

Republicans Gone Wild – Republicans have gone off message, something very uncharacteristic of them. Why?

Fixing Immigration – You don’t stop the flow of illegal immigrants by going after them. You stop it by cutting off the supply of the thing they are coming here for: jobs.

July 4th – A recap of our July 4th, and a thanks to those who made it possible

American Exceptionalism – That phrase is being used a lot lately. I don’t think it means what they think it means.

Leo’s Theory on Comic Superheroes – This one will probably get the comic folks riled up…

Wrap-up – Some final thoughts, final thanks, and a reminder about our Facebook contest.